Rob Kinyon wrote: > xOn 5/31/05, Sam Vilain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Rob Kinyon wrote: >> > I would love to see a document (one per editor) that describes the >> > Unicode characters in use and how to make them. The Set implementation >> > in Pugs uses (at last count) 20 different Unicode characters as >> > operators. >> >> I have updated the unicode quickref, and started a Perlmonks discussion >> node for this to be explored - see >> http://www.perlmonks.org/index.pl?node_id=462246 > > As I replied on Perlmonks, it would be more helpful if the Compose > keys were listed and not just the ASCII versions. Plus, a quick primer > on how to enable Unicode in your favorite editor. I don't know about > Emacs, but the Vim documentation on multibyte is difficult to work > with, at best.
Well, :help digraph isn't particularly bad, though the included table only covers latin-1. The canonical source is RFC1345. But I've attached a patch for the set symbols that have them. > Thanks, > Rob
Index: docs/quickref/unicode =================================================================== --- docs/quickref/unicode (revision 4305) +++ docs/quickref/unicode (working copy) @@ -21,6 +21,10 @@ Note that the compose combinations here are an X11R6 standard, and do not necessarily correspond to the compose combinations available when you use your "compose" key. + +The digraphs used in vim come from "Character Mnemonics & Character Sets", +RFC1345 (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1345.txt). After doing :set digraph, +the digraph ^k A B may also be entered as A <BS> B. Unicode ASCII key sequence char fallback Vim Emacs Unix Compose Key combination @@ -30,22 +34,22 @@ ¥ Y ^k Y e C-x 8 Y Compose Y = Set.pm operators (included for reference): - ≠ != - ∩ * - ∪ + + ≠ != ^k ! = + ∩ * ^k ( U + ∪ + ^k ) U ∖ - - ⊂ < - ⊃ > - ⊆ <= - ⊇ >= - ⊄ !( $a < $b ) + ⊂ < ^k ( C + ⊃ > ^k ) C + ⊆ <= ^k ( _ + ⊇ >= ^k ) _ + ⊄ !( $a < $b ) ⊅ !( $a > $b ) ⊈ !( $a <= $b ) ⊉ !( $a >= $b ) - ⊊ < + ⊊ < ⊋ > - ∋/∍ $a.includes($b) - ∈/∊ $b.includes($a) + ∋/∍ $a.includes($b) ^k ) - + ∈/∊ $b.includes($a) ^k ( - ∌ !$a.includes($b) ∉ !$b.includes($a) @@ -58,20 +62,20 @@ So, these *might* be considered not too awful; - × * - ¬ ! + × * ^k * X + ¬ ! ^k N O ∕ / ≡ =:= ≔ := ⩴ or ≝ ::= - ≈ or ≊ ~~ + ≈ or ≊ ~~ ^k ? 2 … ... - √ sqrt() - ∧ && - ∨ || + √ sqrt() ^k R T + ∧ && ^k A N + ∨ || ^k O R ∣ mod (? bit of a stretch, perhaps) - ⌈$x⌉ ceil($x) - ⌊$x⌋ floor($x) + ⌈$x⌉ ceil($x) ^k </> 7 + ⌊$x⌋ floor($x) ^k 7 </> 7 However I think it is a BAD idea that the following unicode characters
