he same syntax as a closure, so how
precisely does the interpreter determind whether you want this to be a
closer or a pass-by-name call. Do you have an example of the perl-ish
code that doesen't break the ideas of lexical scoping? (or am I just not
seeing the subtle difference between your example and a closure?)
-hachi
gue to me.
in order to sound clearer, I think it would need to be written as
if (not defined $foo but $foo eq '') {
but then, what does this give us besides another way to write 'and'?
I could be missing something basic here, ignore me if I am.
>
> }
>
> :-)
--hac
