Adjusted for the most recent notes: includes «op» as the preferred (and
possibly only) spelling of "vectorize". Everything but a few hyperop
issues appears to be close to final, by my count: if/when Larry sticks
a fork() in it, it's done.
hyperoperators:
«op» - When used with any unary or
Michael Lazzaro writes:
> magical whitespace modifier:
>
>_ - When used at the end of a line or between
>statement elements, acts to "remove" whitespace
>when interpreting the statement. (Allows
>whitespace to appear without invoking any
>
On Friday, November 1, 2002, at 12:21 PM, Michael Lazzaro wrote:
^[op] - [maybe] synonym for «op»
- [maybe] synonym for »op«
I think that would be:
`<> - synonym for «op»
`>>op<< - synonym for »op«
Unless I misunderstood Larry's post, in which case it might be:
`<>` - synony
On Fri 01 Nov, Michael Lazzaro wrote:
>
>(heredocs) - [exact format unknown; probably as perl5]
>
There are comments by Larry in Appo 2 wrt RFCs 111 and 162.
Appo 2:
===
111 aaa Here Docs Terminators (Was Whitespace and Here Docs)
162 abb Heredoc Contents
RFC 111: Here D
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Michael Lazzaro wrote:
>... - synonym for ..Inf
Did I miss the report of the bistable ... operator's death?
I've looked around, but I can't seem to find it.
~ John Williams
David Wheeler wrote:
> On Friday, November 1, 2002, at 12:21 PM, Michael Lazzaro wrote:
>
> > ^[op] - [maybe] synonym for «op»
> > - [maybe] synonym for »op«
>
> I think that would be:
>
>`<> - synonym for «op»
>`>>op<< - synonym for »op«
>
> Unless I misunderstood Larry's po
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 12:21:43PM -0800, Michael Lazzaro wrote:
> +&+|+^<<>>- bitwise (integer) operations
> +&= +|= +^= <<= >>=
I might have missed this, but if + introduces bitwise operations,
why aren't we using it in the shift operations?
+&+|+^
> "ML" == Michael Lazzaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
ML>+&+|+^<<>>- bitwise (integer) operations
ML>+&= +|= +^= <<= >>=
ML>~&~|~^- charwise (string) operations
ML>~&= ~|= ~^=
i think those descriptions need to b
> Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
> Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 01:15:05 +0200
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> X-SMTPD: qpsmtpd/0.12, http://develooper.com/code/qpsmtpd/
>
> Michael Lazzaro writes:
>
> > magical whitespace modifier:
> >
> >_ - Whe
Luke Palmer writes:
>
> What _are_ you talking about. IIRC, there were never any plans for
> such a "placeholder." There were the placeholder _variables_, $^x et
> al., but the underscore was never used for such a thing. That could
> be why I've been so confused by some of your examples.
Michael Lazzaro wrote:
~ - force to string context
~ ~= - string concat
ARG. When did this get chosen?
~ has to be absolutly the most difficult letter to type on the intire
keyboard along with ^ and ", because they are also used as a prefix to
make û, ü, õ,
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 08:18:18PM +0100, Dennis Haney wrote:
: Michael Lazzaro wrote:
:
: > ~ - force to string context
:
: > ~ ~= - string concat
:
: ARG. When did this get chosen?
: ~ has to be absolutly the most difficult letter to type on the intire
: keyboar
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002 11:13:36 -0800 Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You're not supposed to use string concatenation
> all that often anyway...
I'm not supposed (for some value of supposed) to use Perl at my job, but I do,
and I suspect I use string concatenation in about one script in five,
13 matches
Mail list logo
