[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maintainer: Larry Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 10 Aug 2004
- Last Modified: 18 Sept 2006
+ Last Modified: 20 Sept 2006
Number: 2
- Version: 69
+ Version: 70
+| capture/arguments/match
+|$args; # all of the above
I'll read that as
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 10:29:57AM -0400, Aaron Sherman wrote:
: I'll read that as conversation terminated.
The conversation is never terminated. However, every now and then I
make feeble attempts to be decisive. :)
: Can you please update S03's Junctive operators section to note how the
:
On 9/21/06, Larry Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: note how the ambiguity of the following are resolved:
:
: a|$b
: a | $b
: a |$b
:
Don't think so. The situation is exactly analogous to:
a%$b
a % $b
a %$b
The cultural ambiguity is also being reduced insofar as we're trying
On 9/21/06, Larry Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A method never takes arguments unless you use : or (), so those are
all infix.
Well, all righty then. Yay for unambiguity! Or disambiguation. Or
nonambiguosity. Or whatever...
The design team worked Really Hard to get rid of that particular
