On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 06:56:25PM -0700, Dave Storrs wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> > You can always just do this:
> >
> > my Value $foo;
> >
> > And $foo will act like a normal scalar taking anything (your PMAW).
>
> If that's the goal, I'd vote that it
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> We could assume untyped variables are untyped, but I'd rather they're
> considered mistakes. Again, the purpose here is to catch mistakes. I
> don't know if this will wind up being more or less annoying, we'll
> have to play with it a little. F
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 01:02:18AM -0500, David L. Nicol wrote:
> > The real problem isn't [sig digs]. The real problem is how much this
> > complicates the implicit typing rules. I'm going to have to play
> > around a bit and see which way works best.
>
> I hope you're proposing that fatal err
Michael G Schwern wrote:
> I'm going to say you need sigils for this:
>
> print "Hello, my name is $name\n";
>
> You're going to say this:
>
> print "Hello, my name is $(name)\n";
I actually prefer
print "Hello, my name is ",name,"\n";
or,
the sigil is simply optio
