Re: Ideas for a "Object-Belongs-to-Thread" threading model (nntp: message 9 of 20)

On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:27:18PM +0100, nigelsande...@btconnect.com wrote: > On Fri, 14 May 2010 10:01:41 +0100, Ruud H.G. van Tol - rv...@isolution.nl > <+nntp+browseruk+014f2ed3f9.rvtol#isolution...@spamgourmet.com> wrote: > > > > > >The support of threading should be completely optional. T

Re: Ideas for a "Object-Belongs-to-Thread" threading model (nntp: message 9 of 20)

On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 06:03:46PM +0100, nigelsande...@btconnect.com wrote: > On Fri, 14 May 2010 15:05:44 +0100, B. Estrade wrote: > > >On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:27:18PM +0100, nigelsande...@btconnect.com > >wrote: > >>On Fri, 14 May 2010 10:01:41 +0100, Ruud H.G. van Tol - > >>rv...@isolu

Re: Ideas for a "Object-Belongs-to-Thread" threading model (nntp: message 9 of 20)

On Fri, 14 May 2010 15:05:44 +0100, B. Estrade wrote: On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:27:18PM +0100, nigelsande...@btconnect.com wrote: On Fri, 14 May 2010 10:01:41 +0100, Ruud H.G. van Tol - rv...@isolution.nl <+nntp+browseruk+014f2ed3f9.rvtol#isolution...@spamgourmet.com> wrote: > >The suppo

Re: Ideas for a "Object-Belongs-to-Thread" threading model (nntp: message 9 of 20)

On Fri, 14 May 2010 10:01:41 +0100, Ruud H.G. van Tol - rv...@isolution.nl <+nntp+browseruk+014f2ed3f9.rvtol#isolution...@spamgourmet.com> wrote: The support of threading should be completely optional. The threading support should not be active by default. I'd like to understand why you