On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 10:35:12AM +, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 06:32:10PM -0800, Matthew Wilson wrote:
> > Did you mean to use $z in the say output of the nqp and perl versions of
> > the microbenchmark, or did you mean to run it twice?
>
> I didn't write the nqp microbe
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 06:32:10PM -0800, Matthew Wilson wrote:
> Did you mean to use $z in the say output of the nqp and perl versions of
> the microbenchmark, or did you mean to run it twice?
I didn't write the nqp microbenchmark, and I simply transcribed it to
Perl 5, so it's intentional. I did
Did you mean to use $z in the say output of the nqp and perl versions of
the microbenchmark, or did you mean to run it twice?
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> This is surprising, interesting and pleasing...
>
> There's some example NQP code to time calculating Fibonacci
This is surprising, interesting and pleasing...
There's some example NQP code to time calculating Fibonacci sequences.
I've tweaked it a tiny bit to take an optional count on the command line.
Unfortunately the NQP JVM prototype doesn't yet set @ARGS, so this isn't that
useful. Anyway, the code i
