On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 01:19:20PM +1000, Adam Kennedy wrote:
> >Yes... quasiquoting in Perl 5 is currently crudely emulated
> >by feeding things to PPI::Tokenizer and PPI::Transform. :-)
>
> PPI is not a code parser. By code parser I mean taking a string and
> turning it i
Autrijus Tang wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 09:49:58AM +1000, Brad Bowman wrote:
Autrijus' journal mentions quasiquoting (Perl 5).
Yes... quasiquoting in Perl 5 is currently crudely emulated
by feeding things to PPI::Tokenizer and PPI::Transform. :-)
You're doing what now? :
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 09:49:58AM +1000, Brad Bowman wrote:
> Autrijus' journal mentions quasiquoting (Perl 5).
Yes... quasiquoting in Perl 5 is currently crudely emulated
by feeding things to PPI::Tokenizer and PPI::Transform. :-)
> I was wondering how that would work. Many la
Hi
Autrijus' journal mentions quasiquoting (Perl 5).
I was wondering how that would work. Many languages use unusual
syntax for quasiquoting and code splicing but Perl 6 is already
nibbling into unicode.
Does that mean macros will be grafting and pruning the AST that
comes back from a
