[S29] update (was: Re: Question about $pair.kv)

2005-04-10 Thread Ingo Blechschmidt
Hi, Luke Palmer luke at luqui.org writes: Stevan Little writes: One tests shows $pair.kv returning an array with two elements (the key and value of the pair). (This is also how Pugs currently implements this.) The former is certainly correct. When all else fails, consider a

Question about $pair.kv

2005-04-09 Thread Stevan Little
Hello all, Autrijus asked me to look into the correct behavior for $pair.kv yesterday, and I have been doing some spring cleaning of the Pugs test suite, and found we actually have two conflicting tests for it. So I am asking here to see what the official word is so that I can correct our

Re: Question about $pair.kv

2005-04-09 Thread Ovid
--- Stevan Little [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Autrijus asked me to look into the correct behavior for $pair.kv One tests shows $pair.kv returning an array with two elements (the key and value of the pair). (This is also how Pugs currently implements this.) Another test shows $pair.kv

Re: Question about $pair.kv

2005-04-09 Thread Luke Palmer
Stevan Little writes: One tests shows $pair.kv returning an array with two elements (the key and value of the pair). (This is also how Pugs currently implements this.) Another test shows $pair.kv returning an array with one element which is an array-ref/list which itself has 2 elements