RE: We need an OO issue list & tutorial!

2002-10-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Michael Lazzaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Proposed Remedy: We need to better document our > discussions so that we don't keep having them. That's a groovy idea. It'll help us all by defining terms and providing examples to wrap our brains around. An idea to add to the general concept of Perl6 c

Re: We need an OO issue list & tutorial!

2002-10-04 Thread Michael Lazzaro
On Friday, October 4, 2002, at 12:52 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Perhaps to go with Apocalypses and Exegeses we could have Psalms, a > bunch > of bitsize perls of wisdom. Except, um, psalms are, by definition, > sacred, > so, um, I dunno, just a thought. Larry? Perhaps "Prophecies". Or

RE: We need an OO issue list & tutorial!

2002-10-04 Thread John Williams
On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Perhaps to go with Apocalypses and Exegeses we could have Psalms, a bunch > of bitsize perls of wisdom. Except, um, psalms are, by definition, sacred, > so, um, I dunno, just a thought. Larry? Proverbs?

Re: We need an OO issue list & tutorial!

2002-10-04 Thread John Williams
On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Michael Lazzaro wrote: > Observation: We're doing a *lot* of talking past each other. > > Proposed Remedy: We need to better document our discussions so that we > don't keep having them. > > --- > > I volunteer (*shudder*) to be another grunt secretary and start > compiling a

Re: We need an OO issue list & tutorial!

2002-10-04 Thread schwern
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 03:42:49PM -0600, John Williams wrote: > > Derived from the RFCs and subsequent discussions, here is a proposed OO > > Bill of Rights: fundamental truths that I *think* are already agreed > > upon, and from which all other OO laws must be derived: > > > > (OO Article 1) It