RFC 362 - revisiting the RFC process (was Warnings, strict, and CPAN)

2001-02-19 Thread Edward Peschko
much deleted As much as I'd like to respond to some of these points, I'll refrain from it now, I'll let my RFCs speak for themselves. Speaking of which... apologies in advance for cross-posting this, but I wanted to get the largest audience possible... I won't do it again. At least not in the

Re: RFC 362 - revisiting the RFC process (was Warnings, strict, and CPAN)

2001-02-19 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 07:20 PM 2/19/2001 -0800, Edward Peschko wrote: RFC 362 --- =head1 TITLE The RFC project should be ongoing and more adaptive. It's my understanding that this is, in fact, the plan. The only reason things have paused (and it is a pause, not a stop) is that we're waiting for Larry to