I'm not sure I entirely understand the proposal- does it change Inf aka ∞ ?
Otherwise I like it, and prefer the X::NegInf and X::PosInf,spellings as
being easy-to-understand & a good Huffman-encoding.
Before/AfterEverything are also easy to understand, and would be as natural
to use for sorting s
On 2016-10-30 5:45 AM, yary wrote:
I'm not sure I entirely understand the proposal- does it change Inf aka ∞ ?
Part of the issue I think is that the existing "Inf" aka "∞" don't seem to be
very clearly defined.
What I could find so far, at least with respect to Ranges, is that they are just
On 2016-10-30 4:11 PM, Darren Duncan wrote:
On 2016-10-30 5:45 AM, yary wrote:
Before/AfterEverything are also easy to understand, and would be as natural to
use for sorting strings, eg. for saying if a database NULL should go before the
empty string or after everything else. On the other hand,
