Re: S03 Precedence for junctions

2005-04-17 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 07:29:33AM -0700, Larry Wall wrote: > On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 08:56:46PM +1000, Brad Bowman wrote: > : > : Hi all, > : > : S03 gives infix + a higher precedence than junctive > : operators in the listed table, but that seems to contradict > : the examples under "Junctive o

Re: S03 Precedence for junctions

2005-04-17 Thread Larry Wall
On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 08:56:46PM +1000, Brad Bowman wrote: : : Hi all, : : S03 gives infix + a higher precedence than junctive : operators in the listed table, but that seems to contradict : the examples under "Junctive operators". The table is correct, and the examples are wrong. : The relev

S03 Precedence for junctions

2005-04-17 Thread Brad Bowman
Hi all, S03 gives infix + a higher precedence than junctive operators in the listed table, but that seems to contradict the examples under "Junctive operators". The relevant parts of S03 are: Junctive operators 1|2|3 + 4; # 5|6|7 1|2 + 3&4; # (4|5) & (5|6)