Modifiers like :ratchet are lexically scoped, and therefore extend
into any embedded ?before... or ?after..., I think. These days
if you find yourself saying surrounding context, you should usually
ask yourself whether you mean lexical or dynamic, and that often
indicates the direction I'll be
S05 mentions the magic after pattern in two locations, but I cannot
find a specification of the interaction between after and the
ratcheting {rule/token} status.
Specifically, is
token {
... ?after x
}
going to match the same pattern as
rule {
... ?after x
}
??
I ask because (I just
On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 05:45:40PM -0400, Austin Hastings wrote:
[...]
Specifically, is
token { ... ?after x }
going to match the same pattern as
rule { ... ?after x }
??
I ask because (I just did it, and) with rules encouraging the liberal
use of whitespace, and implicitly
