Re: String Literals, take 3

2002-12-06 Thread Larry Wall
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 10:16:20AM -0700, John Williams wrote: : On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Joseph F. Ryan wrote: : > : > What's wrong with single quoted here-docs? : : What's wrong is that the documentation team is trying to allow \qq[] : there too, contradicting their own assertion that backslashes are

Re: String Literals, take 3

2002-12-06 Thread Michael Lazzaro
On Friday, December 6, 2002, at 09:46 AM, Luke Palmer wrote: 3) allowing \qq[] in single-quoted here-docs. PRO: it's consistent with single-quotes CON: it contradicts the assertion that backslashes are not special in single quoted here-docs The problem is, as Larry said, that heredocs ar

Re: String Literals, take 3

2002-12-06 Thread Luke Palmer
> Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 10:16:20 -0700 (MST) > From: John Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > 2) requiring balanced delimiters to be escaped, >PRO: it's consistent with non-balanced delimiter requirements >CON: you already can; don't force it those who don't want it I'll say no, agreeing with

Re: String Literals, take 3

2002-12-06 Thread John Williams
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Joseph F. Ryan wrote: > > What's wrong with single quoted here-docs? What's wrong is that the documentation team is trying to allow \qq[] there too, contradicting their own assertion that backslashes are not special in that context. > Don't forget that the backslash is already