John Porter wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > :
> > : why should a reader expect that a declarative description
> > : of &foo would be followed by the body of &foo?
>
> Isn't the functional definition of a sub
> just another one of its attributes, anyway?
I'm a little bit disappointed
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 10:07:50AM -0400, John Porter wrote:
> Isn't the functional definition of a sub
> just another one of its attributes, anyway?
Oh my. Form 1, Content 0.
--
An ASCII character walks into a bar and orders a double. "Having a bad
day?" asks the barman. "Yeah, I have a pari
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> :
> : why should a reader expect that a declarative description
> : of &foo would be followed by the body of &foo?
Isn't the functional definition of a sub
just another one of its attributes, anyway?
--
John Porter
Old stuff becomes relevant again...
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Larry Wall)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Larry Wall), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Perl 5 Porters)
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 1997 16:32:29 -0700
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: According to Larry Wal
