On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Aristotle Pagaltzis pagalt...@gmx.de wrote:
* yary not@gmail.com [2015-06-17 17:10]:
Perl6's TEARDOWN
Sorry for the confusion. It’s not in Perl 6. I invented .teardown for
this example because I didn’t want to call it .destroy – that’s all.
That's good to
* yary not@gmail.com [2015-06-17 17:10]:
Perl6's TEARDOWN
Sorry for the confusion. It’s not in Perl 6. I invented .teardown for
this example because I didn’t want to call it .destroy – that’s all.
--
Aristotle Pagaltzis // http://plasmasturm.org/
A couple years ago I wrote a little Perl6 in response to a challenge,
and it took me a while to figure out BUILD, BUILDALL, and new().
Learning the object model meant reading what was available on the web
plus some time on the #perl6 IRC channel. I managed to get it all
working properly for my
* Michael Zedeler mich...@zedeler.dk [2015-06-16 13:10]:
On 06/16/15 12:24, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
* Michael Zedeler mich...@zedeler.dk [2015-06-16 11:35]:
This is working exactly as specified in the synopsis, but does Perl
6 NEED anything like this? Just because something is possible
Hi.
I know that Perl 6 has a lot of live and let live to it, but is it
possible somehow to remove features as well?
The latest comment about language design by Parrot Raiser (great name!)
had me reflect on why I don't use perl any longer, and here is one of
the reasons:
class Person {
Hi Aristotle.
On 06/16/15 12:24, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
* Michael Zedeler mich...@zedeler.dk [2015-06-16 11:35]:
This is working exactly as specified in the synopsis, but does Perl
6 NEED anything like this? Just because something is possible doesn't
make it an automatic requirement!
Well
Aristotle Pagaltzis writes:
Just because you can’t think of the use of a feature doesn’t mean
there isn’t one.
No, though it possibly means the docs could do with a clearer example
which demonstrates its use in a situation where it makes sense to use
it.
Smylers
--
* Michael Zedeler mich...@zedeler.dk [2015-06-16 11:35]:
This is working exactly as specified in the synopsis, but does Perl
6 NEED anything like this? Just because something is possible doesn't
make it an automatic requirement!
Well someone thought they needed it in Perl 5 so they wrote NEXT