On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 03:42:49PM -0600, John Williams wrote:
> > Derived from the RFCs and subsequent discussions, here is a proposed OO
> > Bill of Rights: fundamental truths that I *think* are already agreed
> > upon, and from which all other OO laws must be derived:
> >
> > (OO Article 1) It
On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Michael Lazzaro wrote:
> Observation: We're doing a *lot* of talking past each other.
>
> Proposed Remedy: We need to better document our discussions so that we
> don't keep having them.
>
> ---
>
> I volunteer (*shudder*) to be another grunt secretary and start
> compiling a
On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Perhaps to go with Apocalypses and Exegeses we could have Psalms, a bunch
> of bitsize perls of wisdom. Except, um, psalms are, by definition, sacred,
> so, um, I dunno, just a thought. Larry?
Proverbs?
On Friday, October 4, 2002, at 12:52 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Perhaps to go with Apocalypses and Exegeses we could have Psalms, a
> bunch
> of bitsize perls of wisdom. Except, um, psalms are, by definition,
> sacred,
> so, um, I dunno, just a thought. Larry?
Perhaps "Prophecies". Or
From: Michael Lazzaro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Proposed Remedy: We need to better document our
> discussions so that we don't keep having them.
That's a groovy idea. It'll help us all by defining terms and providing
examples to wrap our brains around.
An idea to add to the general concept of Perl6 c
Observation: We're doing a *lot* of talking past each other.
Proposed Remedy: We need to better document our discussions so that we
don't keep having them.
---
I volunteer (*shudder*) to be another grunt secretary and start
compiling a preliminary document, written as a tutorial for newbies
