On 9/9/05, Juerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am glad "item" is as official as it gets, but I have no personal
> favourite between "list" and "slurpy". Please, list members, start a
> flame w^W^Wdiscussion about this so that it can be settled.
I'll fire the first shot: type names should be nouns
Larry Wall skribis 2005-09-09 16:45 (-0700):
> It's item and list, I think.
Pugs uses CxtItem and CxtSlurpy.
I am glad "item" is as official as it gets, but I have no personal
favourite between "list" and "slurpy". Please, list members, start a
flame w^W^Wdiscussion about this so that it can be s
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 12:36:26AM +0200, Juerd wrote:
: Are "item context" and "slurpy context" official terms yet? (Note that
: "official" is temporary, not permament, and has nothing to do with
: things being set in stone.)
:
: If so, then are the keywords for f
Are "item context" and "slurpy context" official terms yet? (Note that
"official" is temporary, not permament, and has nothing to do with
things being set in stone.)
If so, then are the keywords for forcing context also "item" and
"slurpy",
