On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 10:20:28AM +0200, Yuval Kogman wrote:
: How should this stuff be expressed? 'use less' is cute, but i don't
: think it really gets there.
It's mostly there as a placeholder for all the "true pragmas" that
can be ignored if you don't understand them, an idea I originally
sto
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 08:56:58 -0500, Matt Fowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 08:48:55 -0500, Aaron Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > use less syntax;
> Back out the entire p6 grammar and put in lisp's instead...
Huh. I suppose that's the only difference these days..
Aaaron~
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 08:48:55 -0500, Aaron Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 10:20 +0200, Yuval Kogman wrote:
> > Perl 6 has some more interesting capabilities for lexical scoped
> > hinting of tradeoff preferences. For example:
> >
> > use less precision; #
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 10:20 +0200, Yuval Kogman wrote:
> Perl 6 has some more interesting capabilities for lexical scoped
> hinting of tradeoff preferences. For example:
>
> use less precision; # the default nums created in this scope are
> # lower precision floats
>
> use less
Perl 6 has some more interesting capabilities for lexical scoped
hinting of tradeoff preferences. For example:
use less precision; # the default nums created in this scope are
# lower precision floats
use less cpu; # many places this can have a desired effect
use l
