2000-08-27-12:03:07 Peter Scott:
> > use Fatal qw(:io ...);
> > no Fatal qw(:arithmetic);
>
> Bingo, yes. I will make appropriate changes to RFC 80. You might
> think about whether RFC 70 needs to be changed.
I don't think so; while I mention styles of changes and growth for
F
At 10:26 AM 8/27/00 -0400, Bennett Todd wrote:
>So I'd expect instead
>
> use Fatal qw(:arithmetic :io ...);
>
> > Therefore the default (to get the current behavior) would be that
> > some of the classes had Fatality enabled and others didn't?
>
>And if Fatal supported unimport, then the
2000-08-22-16:40:13 Peter Scott:
> >I'm not sure, but I think Chaim's main point was just that, not
> >that divide-by-zero should be ignored too.
>
> Well, it could be made user-selectable, right Bennett? Do you envisage
> being able to say
>
> use Fatal qw(Arithmetic IO etc)
>
> usi
I have added the remaining changes based on the traffic in -errors
and the batch of changes I received from Peter Scott. Production
formatting has been completed. RFC 88v3d1 is available at:
http://www.avrasoft.com/perl6/rfc88.htm
An updated version of the Perl 5 reference implementati
