Re: RFC for $ME class variable (was Re: RFC 124 (v1) Sort order for any hash)

2000-08-20 Thread Graham Barr
On Sat, Aug 19, 2000 at 09:32:50AM -0700, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: > > "John" == John Siracusa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > John> I don't like $ME either, but my alternative is probably even more > John> blasphemous: use $self. "It usurps a variable name that has been legal for > John> c

Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical calls to initializersanddestructors

2000-09-04 Thread Graham Barr
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 11:09:18AM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote: > Damian Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> But I've gotta nitpick the name. I wonder if BLESS wouldn't be better? > >> print calls PRINT, printf calls PRINTF, even if the subs don't do any > >> printing. Sure makes

Re: RFC 193 (v1) Objects : Core support for method delegation

2000-09-05 Thread Graham Barr
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 09:53:39PM -, Perl6 RFC Librarian wrote: > The proposed delegation mechanism would work via a pragma: > > use delegation > attr1 => [qw( method1 method2 method3 )], > attr2 => [qw( method4 method5 )], > attr3 => [], >

Re: Draft RFC: new pragma: C

2000-09-14 Thread Graham Barr
I would suggest that anyone want to contribute to this discussion should first read the thread about the addition of this pragma to perl5 in the perl5-porters archives http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/cgi-bin/w3glimpse/perl5-porters?query=use+namespace+pragma&errors=0&case=on&maxfiles=100&maxlines=30

Re: RFC 224 (v1) Objects : Rationalizing C, C, and C

2000-09-19 Thread Graham Barr
On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 08:54:30AM -0600, Tom Christiansen wrote: > >This RFC proposes that rather than three separate mechanisms (in three > >separate namespaces) to determine object typing information, Perl 6 > >simply extend the C function to return all the necessary > >information in a list co