Re: RFC 174 (v1) Parse C as C

2000-08-30 Thread Michael G Schwern
ciated with: $r = new(CGI @args); also bother me. The conflict between CGI being a function in the current scope and it being a class is hairy. Which all leads me to want to dump indirect object syntax altogether, but I already said that. :) -- Michael G Schwern http://www.pobox.com/~sch

Re: RFC 238 (v1) length(@ary) deserves a warning

2000-09-15 Thread Michael G Schwern
ason to hold back length(@array). Your arguments about teaching context is enough, though. Perhaps we need prototype support for polymorphic functions? (Something like RFC 97). -- Michael G Schwern http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Just Another Stupid Consultant

Re: RFC 238 (v1) length(@ary) deserves a warning

2000-09-15 Thread Michael G Schwern
t match /proto/. My bad. Okay, its a proposal to overhaul prototyping, cool. But I don't see anything to allow C and C live together. Its a big RFC, I probably missed it. -- Michael G Schwern http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Just Another Stupid Consultant