http://www.salon.com/tech/feature/2000/12/06/bad_computers/index.html
And no, open source software is *not* immune.
Dan
--"it's like this"---
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PRO
Kirrily Skud Robert wrote:
>
> Open Source Writers Group (http://oswg.org/) is a good starting point.
> I'm subscribed to their mailing list.
This is really cool. Should we consider posting an announcement to this
website for potential docs people? Or is it still premature to do
something like
> >Open Source Writers Group (http://oswg.org/) is a good starting point.
> >I'm subscribed to their mailing list. I can think of a couple of
other
> >good places to try, too, but they're a bit politically incorrect to
> >mention in this context :-/
>
> Who on earth would be considered poli
In http://www.mail-archive.com/perl6-internals@perl.org/msg01766.html,
Dan outlined rev 2 of the RFC process, PDD (Perl Design Docs).
Everything seems rather specific to internals - will there be a separate
mechanism in place for all-things non-internal, say, for instance, the format
for a non-in
At 02:39 PM 12/6/00 -0500, Bryan C. Warnock wrote:
>In http://www.mail-archive.com/perl6-internals@perl.org/msg01766.html,
>Dan outlined rev 2 of the RFC process, PDD (Perl Design Docs).
>
>Everything seems rather specific to internals - will there be a separate
>mechanism in place for all-things
On Wed, 06 Dec 2000, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> Well, until Larry releases the spec, just about everything else is frozen,
> though we can certainly expand the PDD stuff to include the standard
> library, documentation, and QA stuff. (It seems a tad premature to be
> proposing language changes when
At 03:08 PM 12/6/00 -0500, Bryan C. Warnock wrote:
>On Wed, 06 Dec 2000, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > Well, until Larry releases the spec, just about everything else is frozen,
> > though we can certainly expand the PDD stuff to include the standard
> > library, documentation, and QA stuff. (It seems a
On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 10:00:50PM +, Nick Ing-Simmons wrote:
> B. The "master" / "apprentice" relationship is just that - it depends
>how the people in question relate. As a potential "master" I am all
>too aware that I am not skilled in teaching - usually because I don't
>know w
Kirrily Skud Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 11:28:31AM -0800, Nathan Wiger wrote:
> >
> > Anyways, that's just one suggestion. Do I have any idea where to find
> > these mythical people? No, unfortunately. Perhaps some feelers on
> > newsgroups might be a good p
On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Steve Fink wrote:
> David Grove wrote:
>
> > Also, as far as documentation goes, I think it _should_ be written by
> > apprentices, so that non-masters can understand it too. That's always been
>
> Except it's a particular duty that nobody really likes to perform. Which
10 matches
Mail list logo
