On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 05:29:53PM -0500, Elaine -HFB- Ashton wrote:
Not all OS, though most, have Perl in the base install and those that do
even have problems. Config.pm has issues on HP and Sun, RedHat has spotty
RPMs that occsaionally go awry.
That's their fault. Find a better
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 05:20:40PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's the trick, Solaris is Sun's Blessed Platform. As a
Linux/PowerPC user, I know how Ziggy feels. I'm almost totally
ignored by Sun and I'd imagine I'd have just as much trouble getting
it working as he did.
This is
Adam Turoff [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] quoth:
*
*This is the issue in a nutshell. Let's not mix business issues
*with technical ones. Let's not mix cluster management with simple
*end-user installation. Let's not mix businesses losing millions
*by the microsecond with the guy who just wants his
On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 11:57:42AM -0500, Elaine -HFB- Ashton wrote:
If Java sucks to install on some boutique/niche platforms it
could mean that a) noone has told them about the issues
I can't even conceive they're not accutely aware.
b) noone in the FreeBSD/Linux world has taken it upon
On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 01:49:45PM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
Perl's great blessing is also it's great curse; there's a single
implementation and that *implementation* happens to be OpenSource.
Try writing a second Perl implementation from scratch.
Fortunately, we don't have to. :)
Perl 6
Stephen Zander [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] quoth:
*
*Speaking as someone with feet firmly in both camps (I'm a Blackdown
*member and the Debian maintainer for the jdk and some of the largest
*perl modules in that distribution), IMNSHO the fatal assumption made
*by millions of people is that Java is
All, of course, imho:
Were something dreadful to happen to Larry and his estate chose to
change the licensing terms of the current *implementation*
Well they can only do that to a copy of their own, not
existing copies. While the law isn't clear on a lot of
nuances related to more complex
