On Wednesday, October 04, 2000 4:19 PM, Nathan Wiger [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
wrote:
> Adam Turoff wrote:
> >
> > RFC Improvement #1: All updated RFCs must contain a CHANGES section.
> >
> > RFC Improvement #2: All updated RFCs must contain a synopsis of
> > relevant discus
On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 02:19:02PM -0700, Nathan Wiger wrote:
>
> And *possibly*: Somebody should be able to pre-scan them. Not for
> content ("bad idea"), but to make sure they fit the format and also
> don't rehash already open or previously covered issues.
The job of the RFC librarian is to
Adam Turoff wrote:
>
> RFC Improvement #1: All updated RFCs must contain a CHANGES section.
>
> RFC Improvement #2: All updated RFCs must contain a synopsis of
> relevant discussion, including opposing views.
>
> RFC Improvement #3: All final RFCs must contain a discussi
