On 19.11.2016 03:14, _ ifdog wrote:
> So why there is not a star release of 2016.10 for windows ?
Because nobody one yet. I'm happy to upload it for you if you provide it.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
https://deploybook.com/ -- https://perlgeek.de/ -- https://perl6.org/
Hi,
On 19.11.2016 03:34, ToddAndMargo wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I just install rakudi-star in my Fedora 24 virtual machine.
>
> I know how to program and run things in perl 5.
>
> Can someone point me to a how to that will show me the
> basic template for running a perl 6 program in Linux.
#!/usr/b
On 11/18/2016 06:34 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
Hi All,
I just install rakudi-star in my Fedora 24 virtual machine.
I know how to program and run things in perl 5.
Can someone point me to a how to that will show me the
basic template for running a perl 6 program in Linux.
Also, do I need to run p
Hi All,
I just install rakudi-star in my Fedora 24 virtual machine.
I know how to program and run things in perl 5.
Can someone point me to a how to that will show me the
basic template for running a perl 6 program in Linux.
Also, do I need to run perl6 through a compiler or
does it compile on
So why there is not a star release of 2016.10 for windows ?
在 ToddAndMargo ,2016年11月19日 10:02写道:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 8:54 PM, ToddAndMargo
mailto:toddandma...@zoho.com>> wrote:
Is this the right perl 6 for Fedora?
rakudo-star-0.0.2016.07-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm
Many thanks,
-T
--
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 8:54 PM,
ToddAndMargo
wrote:
Is this the
right perl 6 for Fedora?
rakudo-star-0.0.2016.07-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm
Many thanks,
-T
Star is the packaged, stable release for users. It's what you will find in
most package managers. People working on rakudo itself work out of git or
use unstable snapshot releases.
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 8:54 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
> Is this the right perl 6 for Fedora?
>
> rakudo-star-0.0.201
Is this the right perl 6 for Fedora?
rakudo-star-0.0.2016.07-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm
Many thanks,
-T
--
~~
Computers are like air conditioners.
They malfunction when you open windows
~~
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 4:57 AM, Andrew Kirkpatrick wrote:
> But IIRC goto &func is more about fooling caller() than TCO, so its
> not that really fast thing some users expect.
Yes, it's more a way to not change the call stack than to optimize it.
Luca