Re: Absolute path to directory of the current perl program

2017-05-27 Thread Gabor Szabo
thanks. $*PROGRAM.dirname.IO.absolute; also works, but yours seem better. As a side note, dirname does not return and IO::Path object either. Gabor On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 6:48 PM, Lloyd Fournier wrote: > I'd use > > $*PROGRAM.absolute.IO.dirname > > I'm not sure why

Re: Get Better error message that "is trait on $-sigil variable not yet implemented. Sorry."?

2017-05-27 Thread Gabor Szabo
Excellent. Thanks. Gabor On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 1:15 PM, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote: > Fixed with https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/f2fca0c8c2 . > >> On 26 May 2017, at 10:47, Brent Laabs wrote: >> >> To file a bug in Rakudo, you should email

Re: problem converting Inf and NaN

2017-05-27 Thread Elizabeth Mattijsen
> On 27 May 2017, at 23:22, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote: >> On 27 May 2017, at 19:33, Marcel Timmerman wrote: >> In perl6 version 2017.04.3-287-g3e7675a built on MoarVM version >> 2017.04-64-g6d5ea04 >> implementing Perl 6.c. I observe the following; >> >> my

Re: problem converting Inf and NaN

2017-05-27 Thread Elizabeth Mattijsen
> On 27 May 2017, at 19:33, Marcel Timmerman wrote: > In perl6 version 2017.04.3-287-g3e7675a built on MoarVM version > 2017.04-64-g6d5ea04 > implementing Perl 6.c. I observe the following; > > my Num $num = Inf; > my FatRat $f = $num.FatRat; > Type check failed in

problem converting Inf and NaN

2017-05-27 Thread Marcel Timmerman
Hi, In perl6 version 2017.04.3-287-g3e7675a built on MoarVM version 2017.04-64-g6d5ea04 implementing Perl 6.c. I observe the following; my Num $num = Inf; my FatRat $f = $num.FatRat; Type check failed in assignment to $f; expected FatRat but got Rational[Num,Int] (?) in block at line

Re: Absolute path to directory of the current perl program

2017-05-27 Thread Lloyd Fournier
I'd use $*PROGRAM.absolute.IO.dirname I'm not sure why .absolute doesn't return an IO::Path object. Maybe that's being addressed as part of Zoffix++'s IO work. On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 10:07 PM Gabor Szabo wrote: > I came up with this: > > say