Todd
What you are asking for is not a bug, but a part of the current stage of
design. It will probably get quicker.
However, the biggest part of the timing is the compilation - as you have
noticed.
When you precompile a module, it stores the byte code. Then it runs
quite well.
Now it IS
On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 12:30 Richard Hainsworth
wrote:
> What you are asking for is not a bug, but a part of the current stage of
> design. It will probably get quicker.
Richard, you should find an appropriate place in the docs and add a section
on setting up your personal zef repo.
Thanks.
-
Hello,
I was trying to reinstall NativeLibs when I noticed this:
$ zef install --force-install --/test NativeLibs
===> Searching for: NativeLibs
===> Updating cpan mirror:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ugexe/Perl6-ecosystems/master/cpan1.json
===> Updating p6c mirror:
https://raw.githubuserco
Hello,
I found out that on my system at a certain point zef was unable to read the
content of ~/.raku/short and because of that to install any other module.
According to zef there were too many files in that directory and indeed
there were a lot of subdirectories.
I don't know what happened, beca
Tom,
I was not clear. I didn't intend to say/mean a different **zef** repo,
but a different Precompilation Cache.
I have done this with Pod::From::Cache. If you think this is worth
discussing in the docs, let me know.
On the other hand, I recompiled raku to make a change, and it needed
acc
$ time raku --stagestats -c GetUpdates.pl6
Stage start : 0.000
Stage parse : 18.405
Stage syntaxcheck: Syntax OK
real0m18.449s
user0m20.673s
sys0m0.223s
On 2020-08-01 10:30, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
What you are asking for is not a bug, but a part of the current stage
For every Unicode operator, there's a "Texas" ASCII equivalent
(==) for ≡
but... none that I can find for ≢
is this an oversight or am I not finding it?
-y
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 3:06 PM Aureliano Guedes
wrote:
> Nice, Daniel,
>
> But, I admit, sometimes I don't like too much some symbols not
There doesn't need to be an ASCII equivalent of ≢, because you can combine
(==) with the ! metaop to come up with !(==)
On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 4:58 PM yary wrote:
> For every Unicode operator, there's a "Texas" ASCII equivalent
> (==) for ≡
> but... none that I can find for ≢
> is this an overs
This made me want to try a contrived puzzle, use 'fff' to show things
between a "start" and 2nd "mark" line. That is, print any line below not
marked with "!" at the start
$ cat example.txt
!ignore me
Start
hi print me
yes!
Mark
still print me
Mark
!ignore this line
!this line too
Start
Hi Yary, Nice code!
The general approach of using an anonymous counter is useful to me. Below
are examples when I only want to recover the first one or two blocks of
text starting with "Start" and ending with "Mark" (nota bene: I took your
example text and deleted the blank lines):
user@book:~$
10 matches
Mail list logo