Hi all.
I've been lurking on this list for years (and once won an "oldest
resurrected conversation" award). I've loved Raku conceptually since the
start, but have only recently been putting it to much use. Mostly, the
reality is as good as the promises, but there are two areas I have been
liking
I suggest making this a problem-solving issue:
https://github.com/raku/problem-solving
> On 11 Dec 2021, at 05:48, Timothy Nelson wrote:
>
> Hi all.
>
> I've been lurking on this list for years (and once won an "oldest resurrected
> conversation" award). I've loved Raku conceptually since
Tim,
Love the suggestions, but some of the syntax is a little confusing. Let me
see if I can reword these a bit:
First off, the good:
BEGIN {} COMPILE ENTER {}
CHECK {} COMPILE LEAVE {}
INIT {} RUNTIME ENTER {}
END {} RUNTIME LEAVE {}
DOC * DOC * (No change)
ENTER {} ENTER {} (No change)
L
REPL says:
> Date.new("2024-02-29").later( :1year);
2025-02-28
Is the following some standard?
> REPL says:
> > Date.new("2024-02-29").later( :1year);
> 2025-02-28
> Is the following some standard?
The string format complies to ISO8601 day format
from date(1)
-I[FMT], --iso-8601[=FMT]
output date/time in ISO 8601 format. FMT='date' for date only (the
default),
