On 2024-05-15 12:08 p.m., William Michels via perl6-users wrote:
I'm wondering if the "trusted" moniker is conferred when a (specified/bespoke)
language version sufficiently sanitizes input?
What you're talking about here and similar has no affect on trusted vs not.
Trusted and untrusted are
El mié, 15 may 2024 a las 21:08, William Michels ()
escribió:
> Thanks for your response, JJ.
>
> I'm wondering if the "trusted" moniker is conferred when a
> (specified/bespoke) language version sufficiently sanitizes input?
>
Not only that, also output to the filesystem and network.
>
> If
Thanks for your response, JJ.
I'm wondering if the "trusted" moniker is conferred when a (specified/bespoke)
language version sufficiently sanitizes input?
If so, your Unicode::Security module would seem to be right on the mark:
https://raku.land/zef:jjmerelo/Unicode::Security
>From what I'm seeing, my impression is that you need to create a specific
version, possibly with Pg bindings, to become either trusted or untrusted;
there's no Trusted "node" (or bun, for that matter), but a "v8js" version
of JavaScript.
Any PL (procedural language) version of the language would
Hi,
Thinking about which database to use with Raku, I started following a question
from StackOverflow--here:
"list of PostgreSQL trusted languages?"
https://dba.stackexchange.com/questions/156631/list-of-postgresql-trusted-languages
From that page I learned that there are both "trusted" and
