Thank you for input. I will try to use gmake later.
If this compilation is ok. can I release this as a Solaris package on
the internet?
Regards,
Adam
Matthew Knepley wrote:
> Nothing is wrong with the PETSc build or libraries. However, your make
> (probably not gmake) has a problem with the ma
On Fri, 11 May 2007, Yi-Feng Adam Zhang wrote:
> I am a Software Engineer, working for Sun Microsystems. My team is
> called Open Source Team. Our intend or goal is to make some
> significant invest on Open Source Community to support them to make
> their software or solution available on Solaris
Hi all,
Recently I am compiling the PETSc 2.3.2 -P10 on Solaris 10 for X86 with
GCC and Sun's f90.
Here is the command I give to configure.py:
./config/configure.py --download-f-blas-lapack=1 --with-mpi=0
Yes. I don't use the MPI intendedly. Because I want to make sure every
thing is ok before
> if test -e ex19.exe; then /usr/bin/rm -f ex19.exe; fi
Looks like this is an issue with /bin/sh on solaris [and with test
command supported by it]. Our solaris build appears to pick up
/usr/xpg4/bin/sh and the build works fine with it.
Satish
--
On Thu, 10 May 2007, Matthew Knepley wrot
On 5/10/07, Adam Zhang wrote:
> Thank you for input. I will try to use gmake later.
>
> If this compilation is ok. can I release this as a Solaris package on
> the internet?
I guess. What is it for?
Thanks,
Matt
> Regards,
> Adam
>
>
> Matthew Knepley wrote:
> > Nothing is wrong with the
Nothing is wrong with the PETSc build or libraries. However, your make
(probably not gmake) has a problem with the make rule that cleans up files
in bmake/common/rules:359. You can just ignore it (or tell us what is wrong).
Thanks,
Matt
On 5/10/07, Yi-Feng Adam Zhang wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
