Actually, making the regularization parameter independent for each
process is much more efficient. Gene Golub had a poster on this at
the last SIAM CS&E meeting.
Matt
On Nov 1, 2007 9:24 AM, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
> On 10/31/07, Barry Smith wrote:
> > Lisandro,
> >A followup to our pre
On Nov 1, 2007, at 10:16 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
> Actually, making the regularization parameter independent for each
> process is much more efficient. Gene Golub had a poster on this at
> the last SIAM CS&E meeting.
>
> Matt
>
> On Nov 1, 2007 9:24 AM, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
>> On 10/31/07
On 10/31/07, Barry Smith wrote:
> Lisandro,
>A followup to our previous discussion. It sounds to me like you
> are "actually" solving an n+1 unknown nonlinear problem where the
> "special" unknown is kept secret from SNES and managed somehow by the
> application code?
That's exactly the cas
