, or should I just go ahead with this?
Jed
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL:
http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20090430
/attachments/20090430/0931e689/attachment.pgp
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20090430/dac3dc7a/attachment.html
.
Jed
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL:
http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20090430/9cb96a05/attachment.pgp
...
URL:
http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20090430/b07e8203/attachment.html
digital signature
URL:
http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20090430/efc592ca/attachment.pgp
attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20090430/1cb25fc0/attachment.html
--
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL:
http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20090430/7fa66867/attachment.pgp
Did you push your latest fixes??
BTW... I could see some foreing (German?) words
output.find('Unbekannte Option') = 0 in config/setCompilers.py
... Would we need this?
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 9:37 PM, Satish Balay balay at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, Satish Balay wrote:
I can see
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
Did you push your latest fixes??
yes - to petsc-dev
http://petsc.cs.iit.edu/petsc/petsc-dev/rev/8dc4b0a673c8
BTW... I could see some foreing (German?) words
output.find('Unbekannte Option') = 0 in config/setCompilers.py
... Would we need this?
10 matches
Mail list logo