On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
3) I would like to add a call to set matrix-free programatically...
something like SNESSetUseMFFD(snes,...). Any signature suggetions
regarding my previous discussions about the many options?
? No need to add this. One
One could have -snes_mf override -snes_mf_operator that would make
sense.
There is no hierarchy of options (first, last, in files etc) in
order to keep the model
simple.
It is always possible someone has two options that conflict with
each other in the
options database. This is
I don't have a problem with (somehow) merging the two options, but
I don't see it
as a big improvement.
-snes_mf -snes_mf_type both or operator
instead of -snes_mf or -snes_mf_operator
I don't see this as a big improvement.
Barry
On May 7, 2009, at 3:47 PM, Jed Brown wrote:
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Jed Brown jed at 59a2.org wrote:
Barry Smith wrote:
? ?I understand this. I just don't view this as a big deal worth
changing the code over.
I agree. ?My comment was that *if* the options were to be changed, as
Lisandro was suggesting, then it would be better
How about?
-snes_mf (means what it currently means)
-snes_mf operator (means what -snes_mf_operator means)
Barry
On May 7, 2009, at 6:03 PM, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Jed Brown jed at 59a2.org wrote:
Barry Smith wrote:
I understand this. I
