why not a single PETSc library

Barry Smith wrote: On Jun 9, 2009, at 4:37 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote: I think its legitimate to only want some of our crap. You only get what you use; if you only use KSP then only the KSP and below stuff will be pulled into your program, so what is the problem? With shared libs, you

why not a single PETSc library

limits, asuming you were already using KSP. Jed -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 260 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20090610

PCShell interface

://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20090610/4a516d89/attachment.pgp

PCShell interface

interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20090610/a3a30d0a/attachment.html

PCShell interface

/attachments/20090610/8cc5f707/attachment.pgp

PCShell interface

/petsc-dev/attachments/20090610/b0f38641/attachment.pgp

PCShell interface

before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20090610/fd3fcf67

PCShell interface

The later is fine you can go with that, though it is inconsistent with Mat (perhaps Mat should be changed :-( On Jun 10, 2009, at 11:40 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote: On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Jed Brown jed at 59a2.org wrote: Barry Smith wrote: Go ahead. This has been on the

PCShell interface

their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20090610/45fa02b4/attachment.html

PCShell interface

-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 260 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20090610/88667aa7/attachment.pgp

GMRES and PC_RIGHT

On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Barry Smithbsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote: On Jun 8, 2009, at 4:32 PM, Lisandro Dalcin wrote: On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Barry Smithbsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote: On Jun 8, 2009, at 3:46 PM, Lisandro Dalcin wrote: Well, all you say that GMRES is not coded

pisses me off to no end

Using C/C++ compiler: /Users/barrysmith/Src/petsc-dev/arch-gnu/bin/ mpicc -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wno-strict-aliasing -g3 C/C++ Compiler version: Using Fortran compiler: /Users/barrysmith/Src/petsc-dev/arch-gnu/bin/ mpif90 -Wall -Wno-unused-variable -g Fortran Compiler version:

pisses me off to no end

On Jun 10, 2009, at 5:32 PM, Jed Brown wrote: Matthew Knepley wrote: I am not opposed to this, but it ONLY works for mpich. Is there any generality for mpicc? FWIW, the -show option also works for Open MPI, HP MPI, and Quadrics MPI (i.e. all that I've had recent contact with). The

PCShell interface

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Barry Smithbsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote: ? Go ahead. This has been on the todo list for a decade. ? Remember to update dev.html with the change and change any examples that use PCShell. ? Note you have to update the Fortran stubs for these beasts (some of the

pull config/BuildSystem and rerun config/configure.py

All petsc-dev users. Next time you pull petsc-dev make sure you pull config/BuildSystem also and rerun your configure with $ {PETSC_ARCH}/conf/reconfigure-${PETSC_ARCH}.py As always, report any problems to petsc-dev at mcs.anl.gov Barry What I changed. I discovered the ar flags Sq