I consider that VecScale() has to be considered a collective that requires
all processors to pass the same value for the scalar in the same way that
VecAXPY() is a collective operation that requires the same value for alpha. The
reason is that though you can pass in different values on differ
>
> --
> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
> experiments lead.
> -- Norbert Wiener
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20100705/817be68c/attachment.html>
xperimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments
is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments
lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20100705/ad59fa0f/attachment.html>
On Sat, 3 Jul 2010 15:41:53 +0300, Aron Ahmadia wrote:
> I am not sure I understand your argument here (I apologize if I talk past
> you, please feel free to clarify). I am surmising from the rest of your
> paragraph that you feel it would be most beneficial to users to have the
> full flexibili
