1) Jed, what did you do to Barry? =)
2) I am am going to interpret the move from Mercurial to Git as a sign
that the End Times are indeed here.
OK, seriously, I am OK with using Git or Mercurial: I think they are
actually fairly similar tools and each has pluses and minuses. But what
I do want
Hi Richard,
it will still be possible to pull from a Mercurial repository, which is
in sync with the HEAD of the stable master-branch in git. We will also
continue to accept pull requests via Mercurial, so no apocalypse :-)
Best regards,
Karli
On 03/11/2013 10:08 PM, Richard Tran Mills wrote
On Mar 11, 2013, at 10:08 PM, Richard Tran Mills wrote:
> 1) Jed, what did you do to Barry? =)
> 2) I am am going to interpret the move from Mercurial to Git as a sign that
> the End Times are indeed here.
>
> OK, seriously, I am OK with using Git or Mercurial: I think they are actually
> fai
Please review and apply the following patch for release-3.3 (if it is
OK, should be pushed to dev, too).
diff -r ec5e51fd886c src/mat/impls/baij/mpi/mpibaij.c
--- a/src/mat/impls/baij/mpi/mpibaij.c Sat Mar 09 10:50:47 2013 -0600
+++ b/src/mat/impls/baij/mpi/mpibaij.c Mon Mar 11 21:19:18 2013 +030
- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20130311/03ac853e/attachment.html>
n any results to which their
experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20130311/33e9d822/attachment.html>
merged into the current branch and 'git branch
--no-merged' for the converse. Add '-v' for more details about the branch.
Is this what you were looking for?
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20130311/0a61708b/attachment.html>
This weekend, I spent some time making a modified version of
src/ksp/ksp/examples/tutorials/ex2.c
where I added the capability to divide the m x n mesh into blocks of size mblk
x nblk respectively. I
believe I have this debugged and working properly. In building the matrix, I
travel through th
ter
want to find it, it will still be in the reflog
$ git reflog --grep "something relevant"
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20130311/8e4cf954/attachment-0001.html>
As I understand it [from discussing with Jed] - 'git HEAD' is
equivalent to 'hg parent'.
But I'm not sure what the equivalent of 'hg head' is.
[which is where all dangling heads would be captured - and
hg would warn/force a merge - before push]
Satish
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013, Matthew Knepley wrote:
you what is screwed up.
>
Sure, and we can add to it as we learn more ways that people can get lost.
Using __git_ps1 helps a lot.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20130311/edb916f9/attachment.html>
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Jed Brown wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Sean Farley
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Jed Brown wrote:
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Sean Farley
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Well ? did you try this with the equivalent merc
st experimenters take for granted before they begin their
experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20130311/98941c84/attachment-0001.html>
> I don't think this will be any
> more stable than everyone working in different clones for different
> projects.
More questions for new/better model:
- A clone for a project?
Then I would have multiple clones if I work on more than one projects.
Actually, I've never only worked on a single proje
On Mar 11, 2013, at 3:12 PM, Hong Zhang wrote:
> No matter what new/better model is being introduced, please also try
> to make the model
> as SIMPLE as possible.
> Below is what I learned from Jed this morning (correct me if I'm wrong):
>
> 1. a stable branch of petsc-dev for users
> 2. a dyn
tscfix.h, petscconf.h and petscfptimpl.h are included under some
>> circumstances - but don't exist.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Karli
>>
>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: petsc-include-graph-src.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 46317 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20130311/3f9d4187/attachment-0001.pdf>
No matter what new/better model is being introduced, please also try
to make the model
as SIMPLE as possible.
Below is what I learned from Jed this morning (correct me if I'm wrong):
1. a stable branch of petsc-dev for users
2. a dynamic branch, e.g., named 'next', for group of internal petsc dev
Hmm, looks like I got the two malloc sizes backwards? locrowlens should be
size m and row lengths size mmax?
Barry
/* distribute row lengths to all processors */
ierr = PetscMalloc((mmax+1)*sizeof(PetscInt),&locrowlens);CHKERRQ(ierr);
if (!rank) {
mend = m;
if (size == 1) m
Karl Rupp writes:
> Hi Sean,
>
> >>> Satish, please remove me from petsc-maint. Also, remove me from the
developers webpage. I have already purged petsc-dev from my system and
won't be pushing anything else from now on.
>>>
>>> Huh, why this? This is not forced change of religion...
>>
Hi Sean,
>>> Satish, please remove me from petsc-maint. Also, remove me from the
>>> developers webpage. I have already purged petsc-dev from my system and
>>> won't be pushing anything else from now on.
>>
>> Huh, why this? This is not forced change of religion...
>
> Why should I bother? Everyo
Karl Rupp writes:
> Hi Sean,
>
>> Satish, please remove me from petsc-maint. Also, remove me from the
>> developers webpage. I have already purged petsc-dev from my system and
>> won't be pushing anything else from now on.
>
> Huh, why this? This is not forced change of religion...
Why should I
Hi Sean,
> Satish, please remove me from petsc-maint. Also, remove me from the
> developers webpage. I have already purged petsc-dev from my system and
> won't be pushing anything else from now on.
Huh, why this? This is not forced change of religion...
Best regards,
Karli
Barry Smith writes:
>To users of petsc-dev,
>
> I promised more details on the planned change and why we are making
> them.
>
> The plan is to move petsc-dev over to the git repository system
> (remaining on bitbucket.org so no new accounts are needed) with a simple and
> slow
To users of petsc-dev,
I promised more details on the planned change and why we are making them.
The plan is to move petsc-dev over to the git repository system
(remaining on bitbucket.org so no new accounts are needed) with a simple and
slow transition from Mecurial and allowi
Hi Paul,
you've got two options:
a) Fork the project on Bitbucket, apply the changes to a clone of the
forked repository, commit your changes and submit a pull request.
Important: This needs to be completed by tomorrow! More detailed
information on the process can be found e.g. here:
http://
;http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20130311/90a52b1b/attachment.html>
26 matches
Mail list logo
