Re: [petsc-dev] seen on a competitors site

2013-07-09 Thread Aron Ahmadia
I can get you in contact with the folks at Continuum responsible for testing. I suggest issuing a pull request against the official conda-recipes directory. A On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Jed Brown wrote: > Aron Ahmadia writes: > > > http://docs.continuum.io/conda/build.html > > > > Proba

Re: [petsc-dev] seen on a competitors site

2013-07-09 Thread Jed Brown
Aron Ahmadia writes: > http://docs.continuum.io/conda/build.html > > Probably most relevant :) > > https://github.com/ContinuumIO/conda-recipes/tree/master/trilinos Looks easy. Is there some automated testing or are we expected to spin up Anaconda instances on all supported architectures? pgp

Re: [petsc-dev] seen on a competitors site

2013-07-09 Thread Jed Brown
Satish Balay writes: > Hm http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/pricing/ talks about 'instances' 'small, > medium, large etc..' Not sure what they refer to. http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/instance-types/ The CC2 systems are likely most suitable for scientific purposes. > [petsc@localhost ~]$ du -sh petsc-3.3-

Re: [petsc-dev] seen on a competitors site

2013-07-09 Thread Aron Ahmadia
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Jed Brown wrote: > > > If you guys want to go through the small pain of setting up conda > > installation files for binstar, Continuum can host you guys through > wakari > > (including launching parallel cloud runs on EC2), as well as provide > binary > > installer

Re: [petsc-dev] seen on a competitors site

2013-07-09 Thread Satish Balay
On Tue, 9 Jul 2013, Jed Brown wrote: > Satish Balay writes: > > > I was thinking more in terms of what amzon would charge for using such > > big images. [presumably charge rate would be higher] > > It is just disk space; the EBS limit is 1 TiB: > > http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/User

Re: [petsc-dev] seen on a competitors site

2013-07-09 Thread Jed Brown
Aron Ahmadia writes: > If you guys want to go through the small pain of setting up conda > installation files for binstar, Continuum can host you guys through wakari > (including launching parallel cloud runs on EC2), as well as provide binary > installers for you on OS X, Windows, and Linux. Ca

Re: [petsc-dev] seen on a competitors site

2013-07-09 Thread Matthew Knepley
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Jed Brown wrote: > Matthew Knepley writes: > > > I have a buddy with a company that does this. Once they are more > > established, I think it might be a good collaboration. EC2 time is > > still expensive enough that the only people that use it are willing to > >

Re: [petsc-dev] seen on a competitors site

2013-07-09 Thread Jed Brown
Matthew Knepley writes: > I have a buddy with a company that does this. Once they are more > established, I think it might be a good collaboration. EC2 time is > still expensive enough that the only people that use it are willing to > pay for software and support. If you are fine with batch proc

Re: [petsc-dev] seen on a competitors site

2013-07-09 Thread Aron Ahmadia
If you guys want to go through the small pain of setting up conda installation files for binstar, Continuum can host you guys through wakari (including launching parallel cloud runs on EC2), as well as provide binary installers for you on OS X, Windows, and Linux. A On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 4:33 P

Re: [petsc-dev] seen on a competitors site

2013-07-09 Thread Jed Brown
Satish Balay writes: > I was thinking more in terms of what amzon would charge for using such > big images. [presumably charge rate would be higher] It is just disk space; the EBS limit is 1 TiB: http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/ComponentsAMIs.html#storage-for-the-root-device

Re: [petsc-dev] seen on a competitors site

2013-07-09 Thread Satish Balay
On Tue, 9 Jul 2013, Jed Brown wrote: > Barry Smith writes: > > > Presumably these images sit somewhere directly on the Amazon EC2 > > (and are never brought home to ANL or anywhere else) so storing them > > and "moving them" is not an issue? Doesn't anyone using Amazon EC2 > > have to de

Re: [petsc-dev] seen on a competitors site

2013-07-09 Thread Jed Brown
Barry Smith writes: > Presumably these images sit somewhere directly on the Amazon EC2 > (and are never brought home to ANL or anywhere else) so storing them > and "moving them" is not an issue? Doesn't anyone using Amazon EC2 > have to deal with the fact that the Linux image is big? I d

Re: [petsc-dev] seen on a competitors site

2013-07-09 Thread Barry Smith
Presumably these images sit somewhere directly on the Amazon EC2 (and are never brought home to ANL or anywhere else) so storing them and "moving them" is not an issue? Doesn't anyone using Amazon EC2 have to deal with the fact that the Linux image is big? Barry On Jul 9, 2013, at 2:34 P

Re: [petsc-dev] seen on a competitors site

2013-07-09 Thread Satish Balay
On Tue, 9 Jul 2013, Barry Smith wrote: > > Available for cloud computing on Amazon EC2 with preloaded images. Last I tried to create a PETSc VM [locally - not amazon] - the linux image was a few GB - and PETSc part another couple of GB. [my image is curently at 8.3G - with perhaps a cleaned up

Re: [petsc-dev] seen on a competitors site

2013-07-09 Thread Matthew Knepley
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Barry Smith wrote: > > Available for cloud computing on Amazon EC2 with preloaded images. > I have a buddy with a company that does this. Once they are more established, I think it might be a good collaboration. EC2 time is still expensive enough that the only peo

[petsc-dev] seen on a competitors site

2013-07-09 Thread Barry Smith
Available for cloud computing on Amazon EC2 with preloaded images.

Re: [petsc-dev] Migrate SLEPc to bitbucket

2013-07-09 Thread Jed Brown
"Jose E. Roman" writes: > I don't know. Maybe it is better to have a slepc team account, then I > would add you as an administrator. Is this ok? That's fine. We could also add you as an admin to the PETSc account and you can have a SLEPc group so that you could manage permissions for petsc/slep

Re: [petsc-dev] Migrate SLEPc to bitbucket

2013-07-09 Thread Jose E. Roman
El 09/07/2013, a las 03:01, Jed Brown escribió: > "Jose E. Roman" writes: > >> Now that slepc-3.4 is out, I would like to migrate the SLEPc >> repository to bitbucket. I think it is good to have a user experience >> and workflow as close to PETSc as possible. > > Great, would you prefer this t