Re: [petsc-dev] calling petsc from a mex file

2018-05-10 Thread Vaclav Hapla
I confirm the same problem. But I also don't know how to fix this systematically in the buildsystem. I found hard-coded -L options here https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/src/9e21ac129fc054b3abeb584f186c61369f6d442a/config/BuildSystem/config/packages/MatlabEngine.py#lines-39 but I'm in doubts I

[petsc-dev] Proposed changes to TS API

2018-05-10 Thread Zhang, Hong
Dear PETSc folks, Current TS APIs (IFunction/IJacobian+RHSFunction/RHSJacobian) were designed for the fully implicit formulation F(t,U,Udot) = G(t,U). Shampine's paper (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377042706004110?via%3Dihub

Re: [petsc-dev] Proposed changes to TS API

2018-05-10 Thread Jed Brown
"Zhang, Hong" writes: > Dear PETSc folks, > > Current TS APIs (IFunction/IJacobian+RHSFunction/RHSJacobian) were designed > for the fully implicit formulation F(t,U,Udot) = G(t,U). > Shampine's paper > (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377042706004110?via%3Dihub

Re: [petsc-dev] Proposed changes to TS API

2018-05-10 Thread Zhang, Hong
On May 10, 2018, at 4:12 PM, Jed Brown mailto:j...@jedbrown.org>> wrote: "Zhang, Hong" mailto:hongzh...@anl.gov>> writes: Dear PETSc folks, Current TS APIs (IFunction/IJacobian+RHSFunction/RHSJacobian) were designed for the fully implicit formulation F(t,U,Udot) = G(t,U). Shampine's paper (

Re: [petsc-dev] Proposed changes to TS API

2018-05-10 Thread Matthew Knepley
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 5:12 PM, Jed Brown wrote: > "Zhang, Hong" writes: > > > Dear PETSc folks, > > > > Current TS APIs (IFunction/IJacobian+RHSFunction/RHSJacobian) were > designed for the fully implicit formulation F(t,U,Udot) = G(t,U). > > Shampine's paper (https://www.sciencedirect.com/sci

Re: [petsc-dev] Proposed changes to TS API

2018-05-10 Thread Smith, Barry F.
> On May 10, 2018, at 4:12 PM, Jed Brown wrote: > > "Zhang, Hong" writes: > >> Dear PETSc folks, >> >> Current TS APIs (IFunction/IJacobian+RHSFunction/RHSJacobian) were designed >> for the fully implicit formulation F(t,U,Udot) = G(t,U). >> Shampine's paper >> (https://www.sciencedirect.c