Re: [petsc-dev] [petsc-maint] PETSc release by March 29, 2019

2019-03-28 Thread Balay, Satish via petsc-dev
All, Th current master is in a good shape for a release. I'll look at spinning the release after 'master' test today evening. Please do not push any code changes to master [but please do check for any needed doc fixes] Thanks, Satish On Tue, 26 Mar 2019, Balay, Satish via petsc-maint wrote:

Re: [petsc-dev] DMDA VTK viewer regression: field names missing

2019-03-28 Thread Dave May via petsc-dev
I'd advocate flattening everything as a scalar field. Why? 1) the xml vtk formats for vector only work if ncomponents = 3, so for a 2d field you have to insert a dummy set of zero values for the z component 2) its simple to build vector fields which paraview can render if the scalar fields are

Re: [petsc-dev] DMDA VTK viewer regression: field names missing

2019-03-28 Thread Dave May via petsc-dev
On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 at 15:42, Jed Brown via petsc-dev wrote: > Matthew Knepley writes: > > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 10:56 PM Jed Brown via petsc-dev < > > petsc-dev@mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > > > >> Prior to this PR, which was merged for 3.10 > >> > >> > >> >

Re: [petsc-dev] [petsc-users] Bad memory scaling with PETSc 3.10

2019-03-28 Thread Victor Eijkhout via petsc-dev
On Mar 27, 2019, at 8:30 AM, Matthew Knepley mailto:knep...@gmail.com>> wrote: I think Satish now prefers --with-cc=${MPICH_HOME}/mpicc --with-cxx=${MPICH_HOME}/mpicxx --with-fc=${MPICH_HOME}/mpif90 That still requires with-mpi:

Re: [petsc-dev] DMDA VTK viewer regression: field names missing

2019-03-28 Thread Jed Brown via petsc-dev
Matthew Knepley writes: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 10:56 PM Jed Brown via petsc-dev < > petsc-dev@mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > >> Prior to this PR, which was merged for 3.10 >> >> >> https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/pull-requests/1029/dmda-vtk-viewing-output-multiple-dof/diff >>