Jed,
Thanks for your feedback.
> On Oct 23, 2019, at 7:15 PM, Jed Brown wrote:
>
> IMO, Figures 2 and 7+ are more interesting when the x axis (vector size)
> is replaced by execution time.
> We don't scale by fixing the resource
> and increasing the problem size, we choose the
Karl,
Thanks for your comments.
> On Oct 10, 2019, at 12:34 AM, Karl Rupp via petsc-dev
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Table 2 reports negative latencies. This doesn't look right to me ;-)
> If it's the outcome of a parameter fit to the performance model, then use a
> parameter name (e.g.
Hi Gautam,
Apologies for overlooking this. The slides are now available online:
https://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/meetings/2019/slides/mills-petsc-2019.pdf
There isn't a whole lot in terms of GPU results in there, but GPU support is
currently a very active area of development for the PETSc team
