Re: [petsc-dev] Statistics on the popularity of PETSc

2020-09-17 Thread Victor Eijkhout
On , 2020Sep17, at 14:06, Blaise A Bourdin mailto:bour...@lsu.edu>> wrote: But even this would only count the users who load the TACC provided modules, and not those rebuilding petsc with a specific configuration. Correct. But that’s a tiny minority. I think we have a way of detecting people

Re: [petsc-dev] Statistics on the popularity of PETSc

2020-09-17 Thread Blaise A Bourdin
But even this would only count the users who load the TACC provided modules, and not those rebuilding petsc with a specific configuration. Blaise > On Sep 17, 2020, at 9:34 AM, Victor Eijkhout wrote: > > > >> On , 2020Sep17, at 09:13, Jacob Faibussowitsch wrote: >> >> Victor - Does this c

Re: [petsc-dev] Statistics on the popularity of PETSc

2020-09-17 Thread Victor Eijkhout
On , 2020Sep17, at 09:13, Jacob Faibussowitsch mailto:jacob@gmail.com>> wrote: Victor - Does this count the number of users who simply loaded the module? Or users who submitted a job using the petsc module (if that’s even tracked?). The latter. It tracks what modules are loaded when a bat

Re: [petsc-dev] Statistics on the popularity of PETSc

2020-09-17 Thread Jacob Faibussowitsch
Victor - Does this count the number of users who simply loaded the module? Or users who submitted a job using the petsc module (if that’s even tracked?). Barry - w.r.t. your point about questionnaires not being overly useful what about asking users to send automated diagnostic reports if petsc