Re: [petsc-dev] builds of PETSc based packages should not get their own secret files

2021-01-05 Thread Barry Smith
> On Jan 5, 2021, at 5:30 PM, Satish Balay via petsc-dev > wrote: > > BTW: for CI - the following might grab most of the config logs as artifacts > [assuming they are either config.log or configure.log] - but yeah - all logs > won't be in the same location [or single file, and good to have

Re: [petsc-dev] builds of PETSc based packages should not get their own secret files

2021-01-05 Thread Satish Balay via petsc-dev
BTW: for CI - the following might grab most of the config logs as artifacts [assuming they are either config.log or configure.log] - but yeah - all logs won't be in the same location [or single file, and good to have a fix that works for both users and CI] Satish diff --git a/.gitlab-ci.

Re: [petsc-dev] builds of PETSc based packages should not get their own secret files

2021-01-05 Thread Satish Balay via petsc-dev
On Tue, 5 Jan 2021, Satish Balay via petsc-dev wrote: > On Tue, 5 Jan 2021, Barry Smith wrote: > > > > > > > > On Jan 5, 2021, at 8:28 AM, Satish Balay wrote: > > > > > > Well we have to look at artifacts for configure.log. Why is this more of > > > a burden for slepc or externalpackage logs

Re: [petsc-dev] builds of PETSc based packages should not get their own secret files

2021-01-05 Thread Satish Balay via petsc-dev
On Tue, 5 Jan 2021, Barry Smith wrote: > > > > On Jan 5, 2021, at 8:28 AM, Satish Balay wrote: > > > > Well we have to look at artifacts for configure.log. Why is this more of a > > burden for slepc or externalpackage logs? > >Some of the "artifacts" don't even exist to look at as artifa

Re: [petsc-dev] builds of PETSc based packages should not get their own secret files

2021-01-05 Thread Barry Smith
> On Jan 5, 2021, at 8:28 AM, Satish Balay wrote: > > Well we have to look at artifacts for configure.log. Why is this more of a > burden for slepc or externalpackage logs? Some of the "artifacts" don't even exist to look at as artifacts; for example slepc4py log files. And if we continu

Re: [petsc-dev] builds of PETSc based packages should not get their own secret files

2021-01-05 Thread Satish Balay via petsc-dev
Well we have to look at artifacts for configure.log. Why is this more of a burden for slepc or externalpackage logs? Whatever you say for slepc log applies for configure.log. If its only CI issue - and you want all logs on STDOUT - then you can modify .gitlab-ci.yml. Perhaps: diff --git a/.g