On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 5:47 PM Scott Kruger wrote:
> On 2021-04-06 14:44, Matthew Knepley did write:
> > > > Does spack have some magic for this we could use?
> > > >
> > >
> > > spack developed the archspec repo to abstract all of these issues:
> > > https://github.com/archspec/archspec
> >
> >
On 2021-04-06 14:44, Matthew Knepley did write:
> > > Does spack have some magic for this we could use?
> > >
> >
> > spack developed the archspec repo to abstract all of these issues:
> > https://github.com/archspec/archspec
>
>
> I do not love it. Besides the actual code (you can always
Ok, thanks. I am not sure how to handle it. libgcc_s.1.dylib never appears
in the configure process and we don't actually test that the Fortran compiler
can link C; for 25 years it just always could.
Barry
> On Apr 7, 2021, at 10:49 AM, Blaise A Bourdin wrote:
>
> No luck with -lgcc
There are always diffs (between different compilers, versions, hardware) -
doesn't necessarily mean failures.
Very large diffs [as Barry mentioned] might require a closer look.
Depending upon your purpose - you might consider that you have a valid petsc
install and start using it.
Obviously -
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 7:44 PM Abhyankar, Shrirang G <
shrirang.abhyan...@pnnl.gov> wrote:
> Hong,
>
> It was just to keep things simple. We can have an API (and a run-time
> option) for setting the max. number of components instead of a configure
> option. I can work on making this change.
>