On 2021-05-19 08:36, Patrick Sanan did write:
> Cool - I didn't know about this approach - If you still have your experiments
> sitting around, can you put numbers on what kind of space savings are we
> talking about vs the dumb approach (I have an independent clone for every
> branch I'm
Lawrence,
Oh, I always use that, (even now) my prompt is miles long. Didn't help me
at all, I still messed up constantly; my brain ignores what my eyes clearly
see. I need more than a clear sign post telling me where I am, I need a hammer
that hits me whenever I do something wrong in
> On 19 May 2021, at 15:38, Barry Smith wrote:
>
> I tried the multiple clone approach first but found I was constantly
> thinking I was in a different branch than I was in as I went between clones
> and messing up my working directory and getting confused and frustrated. So I
>
I will submit an MR to reduce the CI time, sorry about this. I'm not sure why
I ended up with such a big CI test case, probably just sloppiness.
> On May 19, 2021, at 6:11 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
>
> This is taking hundreds of seconds in every run. For the CI, shouldn't we
> reduce the
I tried the multiple clone approach first but found I was constantly thinking
I was in a different branch than I was in as I went between clones and messing
up my working directory and getting confused and frustrated. So I developed
some of my tools because I was unable to utilize my brain
+1
The help says for timing tests, but it makes no sense to me for them being
part of the entire CI
We should probably have a dedicated runner for performance regressions
(running only performance runs, something like requires: performance)
Not sure why the sizes are so large, probably Barry wants
This is taking hundreds of seconds in every run. For the CI, shouldn't we
reduce the size of the matrix, maybe to 5000 instead of 5?
Thanks,
Matt
--
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which
Cool - I didn't know about this approach - If you still have your experiments
sitting around, can you put numbers on what kind of space savings are we
talking about vs the dumb approach (I have an independent clone for every
branch I'm interested in working on simultaneously)?
@Barry - thanks
