Hello all,

thanks for proposing projects. I've created the suggestions so far as 'issues' in the issue tracker on Gitlab, prefixed by 'GSoC:'. Please add a better description to your suggestions so that applicants get a better idea of what that project is all about and how to get started. :-)

Also, Satish, Junchao, Jed, and Matt should have received invitations to join the PETSc org for GSoC 2023. Please join today, as we need to apply by tomorrow (Tuesday) 18:00 UTC.

I've got one question regarding payment processing; since that is a bit sensitive, I'll send it to the private list petsc-maint.

Thanks and best regards,
Karli



On 2/4/23 20:46, Matthew Knepley wrote:
On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 6:28 PM Jed Brown <j...@jedbrown.org <mailto:j...@jedbrown.org>> wrote:

    Thanks for proposing this. Some ideas:

    * DMPlex+libCEED automation
    * Pipelined Krylov methods using Rust async
    * Differentiable programming using Enzyme with PETSc


I like all those.

   Matt

    Karl Rupp <r...@iue.tuwien.ac.at <mailto:r...@iue.tuwien.ac.at>> writes:

     > Dear PETSc developers,
     >
     > in order to attract students to PETSc development, I'm thinking
    about a
     > PETSc application for Google Summer of Code (GSoC) 2023:
     > https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/programs/2023
    <https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/programs/2023>
     >
     > The org application deadline is February 7, i.e. in 4 days. This
     > application is - roughly speaking - a form with a state of intent
    and a
     > justification why the project is a good fit for GSoC. I've done
    this in
     > the past (~2010-12) and can do the paperwork again this year.
     >
     > What is required:
     >   - PETSc developers, who are willing to act as mentors
    throughout the
     > program.
     >   - A few good project ideas (e.g. MATDENSE for GPUs) for
     > contributors/students to work on
     >
     > It used to be that new organizations will get at most 2 contributor
     > slots assigned. That's fair, because one must not underestimate the
     > effort that goes into mentoring.
     >
     > Thoughts? Shall we apply (yes/no)? If yes, are you willing to be
    mentor?
     > The more mentors, the better; it underlines the importance of the
     > project and indicates that contributors will find a good environment.
     >
     > Thanks and best regards,
     > Karli



--
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener

https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>

Reply via email to