results if they are relevant.
On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 11:57 PM Ali Reza Khaz'ali via petsc-dev
mailto:petsc-dev@mcs.anl.gov> > wrote:
Dear Jed,
It is ILU(0) since I did not set the levels. Also, no shift was applied. I have
attached a Jacobian matrix for the smallest case that I c
Dear Jed,
ILU with BAIJ works, and its performance in reducing the condition number is
slightly better than PCVPBJACOBI. Thanks for your guidance.
Best wishes,
Ali
-Original Message-
From: Jed Brown
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2018 9:40 PM
To: Ali Reza Khaz'ali ; 'Smith, Barry F.'
Dear Jed,
Thanks for your kind answer. I thought Scalar BJACOBI does not need data from
the other domains, but ILU does. I have tested my code with scalar ILU.
However, no KSP could converge. Also, there are no zeros on the diagonal, at
least in the current cases that I am simulating them. Howe
Hi,
Ithink that the topic is more suited for PETSc-developers than its
users; therefore, I move it to the dev list.
Continuing the discussion on implementing a variable-block size BILU
preconditioner, would it be possible to change the block size parameter
(bs) on BAIJ format such that it ca