only once for each function
it appears in
gmake[2]: *** [gmakefile:227: x86_64/obj/src/mat/impls/hypre/mhypre.o]
Error 1
Please, take a look.
[1] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6330/26056330/build.log
System: Fedora 29 (devel branch)
GCC 8.0.1
OpenMPI 2.1.1
Hypre 2.14.0
--
---
es list:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/9567/28789567/root.log
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE
GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Checking for headers User specified OPENBLAS libraries: []
Configure header /tmp/petsc-y1LlML/confdefs.h
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE
GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/
i.so.20.10.3)
==25868==by 0x49E0B0F: PetscInitialize (pinit.c:875)
==25868==by 0x8049643: main (ex19.c:106)
...
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE
GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/
> This looks like an OpenMPI bug. Does it work with MPICH?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt
Yes, it works with MPICH.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE
GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/
ING'
undeclared (first use in this function)
__pyx_t_7 =
__Pyx_PyInt_From_KSPConvergedReason(KSP_CONVERGED_ITERATING); if
(unlikely(!__pyx_t_7)) __PYX_ERR(37, 64, __pyx_L1_error)
^
error: command 'mpicc' failed with exi
o errors
Yes, it does not happen on Fedora. That error appears on CentOS-7
machines only, both with Python2 and Python3.
petscconf.h is attached
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84
GPG key server: https://keys.o
On 22/12/19 20:32, Antonio Trande wrote:
> On 22/12/19 20:15, Balay, Satish wrote:
>> This error is strange. The issue does not come up in petsc build - but in
>> petsc4py build.
>>
>> I see the petsc4py build is with:
>>
>>>>>>>>
file `petsc-3.13.0/config/BuildSystem/config/packages/sundials.py`
reports:
self.version = '2.5.0'
self.maxversion = '2.5.10'
so, i presume, it doesn't.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key:
o you have idea why this happens?
Regards.
---
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org
http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter
GPG Key: 0x6CE6D08A
Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
usr/include/openmpi-%_arch \
see
http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/sagitter/petsc/petsc.git/tree/petsc.spec?id=9ca08a9a53b74534e0fcfdbc5973f2f006964387#n703
--
---
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org
http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/
https://f
g, please, see
https://paste.fedoraproject.org/445643/
Starting from line #8, is tested 'libpetsc.so'.
Starting from line #162, is tested 'libpetsc64.so' (with 64bit indices).
--
---
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org
http://fedoraos
On 10/07/2016 03:55 PM, Satish Balay wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Antonio Trande wrote:
>
>> Thanks for your replies.
>> I have fixed almost entirely all unused dependencies.
>>
>>
>> petsc.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
>> /usr/li
On 10/07/2016 06:03 PM, Satish Balay wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Matthew Knepley wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Antonio Trande
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all.
>>>
>>> This issue is related to discussion from dev-ML:
>>> http
sp_type fgmres
> lid velocity = 0.0016, prandtl # = 1., grashof # = 1.
> Number of SNES iterations = 2
> <<<<<
>
> I'm not sure why it behaves differently with a source build.. [some bugfixes
> since v0.2.18-5?]
>
> But there are other examples that appear
On 10/08/2016 12:42 AM, Satish Balay wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Antonio Trande wrote:
>
>> On 10/07/2016 08:29 PM, Satish Balay wrote:
>>> When I build openblas from sources - I don't see this error.
>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>&
x86_64/00462470-petsc/build.log.gz
Extracted section about testing: https://paste.fedoraproject.org/446212/
PS.
Does not appear any error if running 'make test' on my PC.
--
---
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org
http://fedoraos.
On 10/08/2016 05:57 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
> This is a rebuild of OpenBlas outside Fedora repositories, so they're
> unofficial packages; i have included optimization flags +
> '-fdefault-integer-8' for 64bit-int libs:
>
> Fedora 24 packages:
> https://copr-b
On 10/08/2016 11:00 PM, Satish Balay wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Oct 2016, Antonio Trande wrote:
>
>> On 10/08/2016 05:57 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
>>> This is a rebuild of OpenBlas outside Fedora repositories, so they're
>>> unofficial packages; i have included optimiza
;> info..]
>>>
>>> Perhaps you can rerun this via valgraind again to see what it says.
>>>
>>>
>>> Satish
>>>
>>
>> I dont see any line related to openblas now.
>
> In the valgrind output? What lines do you see?
None line abou
On 10/08/2016 11:50 PM, Satish Balay wrote:
>>
>> Do tests need internet by chance?
>
> Nope - but you might want to disable petscnagupgrade.py in
> lib/petsc/conf/rules
How?
--
---
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot'
On 10/09/2016 11:48 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 4:23 AM, Antonio Trande <mailto:anto.tra...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> On 10/08/2016 11:50 PM, Satish Balay wrote:
> >>
> >> Do tests need internet by chance?
> >
&g
during testing of OpenMPI libs (papi support is disabled):
https://paste.fedoraproject.org/447193/
Full log:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/sagitter/petsc/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00462818-petsc/build.log.gz
--
---
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot&#x
On 10/09/2016 09:12 PM, Satish Balay wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Oct 2016, Antonio Trande wrote:
>
>> On 10/09/2016 05:39 PM, Satish Balay wrote:
>>> Perhaps chkopts also doesn't make sense anymore [esp with user
>>> makefiles] - so you could use the attached patch [whi
petsc/fedora-rawhide-i386/00463045-petsc/build.log.gz
--
---
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org
http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter
GPG Key: 0x6CE6D08A
Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 10/10/2016 04:08 PM, Satish Balay wrote:
> Removing superlu_fixed the previous error? Thats wierd..
No; it was just an attempt.
>
> You can try the attached patch - and see if that fixes this valgrind issue..
>
> Satish
>
> On Mon, 10 Oct 2016, Antonio Trande wrote:
&
On 10/10/2016 07:28 PM, Satish Balay wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Oct 2016, Antonio Trande wrote:
>
>> This error is disappeared.
>
> Its strange that PetscStrncpy() issues comes up only on this one build.
>
>>
>> Build on RHEL6 systems:
>> https://copr-be.cloud.f
On 10/11/2016 12:14 AM, Satish Balay wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Oct 2016, Antonio Trande wrote:
>
>> On 10/10/2016 07:28 PM, Satish Balay wrote:
>>> On Mon, 10 Oct 2016, Antonio Trande wrote:
>
>>
>> New builds:
>>
>> 32bit:
>> https://copr-be.cl
On 10/11/2016 07:53 PM, Satish Balay wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Oct 2016, Antonio Trande wrote:
>
>> On 10/11/2016 12:14 AM, Satish Balay wrote:
>>> On Mon, 10 Oct 2016, Antonio Trande wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 10/10/2016 07:28 PM, Satish Balay wrote:
>&
On 10/11/2016 09:39 PM, Satish Balay wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Oct 2016, Antonio Trande wrote:
>
>> 'configure' does not recognize '-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2' flag (it says that
>> should be -D-FORTIFY-SOURCE=2) that comes from default flags used on
>> Fedora and
On 10/11/2016 11:52 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
> On 10/11/2016 09:39 PM, Satish Balay wrote:
>> On Tue, 11 Oct 2016, Antonio Trande wrote:
>>
>>> 'configure' does not recognize '-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2' flag (it says that
>>> should be -D-FO
On 10/12/2016 07:21 PM, Satish Balay wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2016, Antonio Trande wrote:
>
>> On 10/11/2016 11:52 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
>>> On 10/11/2016 09:39 PM, Satish Balay wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 11 Oct 2016, Antonio Trande wrote:
>>>>
>>&g
On 10/13/2016 02:31 AM, Satish Balay wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2016, Satish Balay wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 12 Oct 2016, Antonio Trande wrote:
>>
>>> Latest builds:
>>> http://copr-fe.cloud.fedoraproject.org/coprs/sagitter/petsc/build/464373/
>
>> I'll
On 10/13/2016 04:13 PM, Satish Balay wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2016, Antonio Trande wrote:
>
>>>>> Latest builds:
>>>>> http://copr-fe.cloud.fedoraproject.org/coprs/sagitter/petsc/build/464373/
>>>
>>>> I'll try and see if I can reprodu
On 10/13/2016 05:54 PM, Satish Balay wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2016, Antonio Trande wrote:
>
>>
>> I guess, we can consider all tests successfully passed.
>
> Great!
Thank you very much for your fundamental support.
>
> I'm sure there will be more issues to
6/root.log
How Configure is called:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/petsc/blob/master/f/petsc.spec#_382
--
--
Antonio Trande
sagitter AT fedoraproject dot org
See my vCard.
<>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
provided
implementations: dense, banded, LAPACK dense, LAPACK band, KLU,
SuperLU_MT, SPGMR, SPBCGS, SPTFQMR, SPFGMR, and PCG. These
implementations replicate previous SUNDIALS generic linear solvers in a
single object-oriented API.*
>
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Antonio Trande <mailto:ant
ed @petsc-maint),
> Pierre
I have just used 1 Make job (make -j1) to complete the compilation.
Anyway, MUMPS-5.2.1 has been just now pushed on Fedora repositories and
compiled fine on Fedora 31 (and CentOS7):
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/MUMPS/tree/master
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
m
38 matches
Mail list logo
