Re: [petsc-dev] [SPAM *****] Re: Issue with Lapack names

> El 18 dic 2017, a las 22:34, Karl Rupp escribió: > > > >> > > This is related to a message I sent 2 years ago to petsc-maint >>"Inconsistent naming of one Lapack subroutine", where I advocated >>renaming LAPACKungqr_ --> LAPACKorgqr_. But that thread did

Re: [petsc-dev] [SPAM *****] Re: Issue with Lapack names

On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Jose E. Roman wrote: > > El 18 dic 2017, a las 19:24, Matthew Knepley > escribió: > > > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 1:24 PM, Jose E. Roman > wrote: > > > El 18 dic 2017, a las 18:58, Matthew Knepley